In these times, it would stand to reason that we have to review love. How much do we understand it? We know we have feelings. Our emotions are inescapable, but emotions are hard to peddle in front of a class or in a circle of friends, and without commitment and understanding, emotions can be left in the most unsafe of places. Not withstanding all these things, love is eternal. It is true. And not withstanding our desire to possess it, to receive it, or to give it, give it away, or to give part of it or ourselves away, we still want some degree of ownership over our love.
If God has sexual parts, at least in Image, then even God would want those parts to be owned by a true lover. Not just any lover, but the truest of lovers. And, as God must relate collectively to humanity, God too must allow for humanity to collectively own God’s sexual parts: conjugally, in image, in mind, in heart, in value, in purpose, with love, with respect, and with value. We are looking for what our truest of love is, but we will never find it without the collective “Our.” So, our truest love is eternal, not withstanding.
So, it is not just a matter of giving, relating, identifying and moving toward God, conjugally. It is not just a matter of experiencing God conjugally. Fundamentally, it is a matter of getting God to give even more of God’s Self conjugally to you. Each person must come to know what it is to be a conjugal partner of God. Our Truest Love must involve the conjugal love of God. If we look at God’s conjugal love without reference to the possessive “of,” we see that God Herself, Himself is in a position of giving, conjugally. I think there is a part of everyone who would like to have God as a Lover, but that is so lost in history, with nearly all secondary moves deficient. Nonetheless, we have to start to characterize it successfully, appropriately, at least in the bare minimum. It is part of a new foundation.
If God has sexual parts, at least in Image, then even God would want those parts to be owned by a true lover. Not just any lover, but the truest of lovers. And, as God must relate collectively to humanity, God too must allow for humanity to collectively own God’s sexual parts: conjugally, in image, in mind, in heart, in value, in purpose, with love, with respect, and with value. We are looking for what our truest of love is, but we will never find it without the collective “Our.” So, our truest love is eternal, not withstanding.
So, it is not just a matter of giving, relating, identifying and moving toward God, conjugally. It is not just a matter of experiencing God conjugally. Fundamentally, it is a matter of getting God to give even more of God’s Self conjugally to you. Each person must come to know what it is to be a conjugal partner of God. Our Truest Love must involve the conjugal love of God. If we look at God’s conjugal love without reference to the possessive “of,” we see that God Herself, Himself is in a position of giving, conjugally. I think there is a part of everyone who would like to have God as a Lover, but that is so lost in history, with nearly all secondary moves deficient. Nonetheless, we have to start to characterize it successfully, appropriately, at least in the bare minimum. It is part of a new foundation.